1.2. Distributions

$\newcommand{\argmin}{\mathop{\mathrm{argmin}}\limits}$ $\newcommand{\argmax}{\mathop{\mathrm{argmax}}\limits}$

In this subsection, we define random variables and distribution functions.


Random variables

In measure theory, a function on a measurable space $A$ onto another measurable space $B$ is measurable if its inverse image of measurable sets are measurable sets. If $A$ is a probability space and $B$ is a Borel measurable space of $\mathbb{R}$, then we call this function a random variable.

Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space. $X: \Omega \to \mathbb{R}$ is a random variable, if for all $B \in \mathcal{ B}$, $X^{-1}(B) \in \mathcal{F}$.

We also say $X$ is $\mathcal{ F}$- measurable or write $X \in \mathcal{ F}$. That is, random variables are Borel measurable real-valued functions defined on a probability space.

(1) If $(\Omega, \mathcal{ F}, P)$ is a discrete probability space, every function is a random variable.
(2) An indicator function $\mathbf{1}_A$, $A \in \mathcal{ F}$ is a random variable.

In undergraduate statistics, we used random variables as if they were values. Now we can understand true meaning behind these notations: \(P(-1\le X \le 1) = P(X^{-1}([-1, 1])) = P(\{\omega\in\Omega:~ X(\omega) \in [-1,1]\})\) and such. Random variables are defined as a measurable function so that their inverse images can be measured by the probability measure $P$.

An important fact is that every random variable induces a probability measure on $(\mathbb{ R}, \mathcal{ B}(\mathbb{ R}))$. (note that it is not on $(\Omega, \mathcal{ F})$.)

$P_X(A) := P(X \in A),~ A \in \mathcal{\mathbb{R}}$ is a probability measure induced by a random variable $X$. $P_X$ is called the distribution of $X$.

It is not difficult to show that such $P_X$ is a probability measure.

Distribution functions

A distribution function of $X$ is defined in terms of probability.

$F:\mathbb{ R}\to\mathbb{ R}$ is a distribution function of $X$.
$\Leftrightarrow$ $F(x) := P(X\le x) = P_X(-\infty, x],~ \forall x \in \mathbb{ R}$.

We already saw in section 1.1 that a distribution function uniquely determines a distribution (or a random variable). The following theorem implies that every function that satisfies some conditions can be regarded as a distribution function of some random variable.

$F$ is a distribution of some random variable $X$ if and only if it is (i) non-decreasing, (ii) right-continuous, (iii) $\lim_{x\to-\infty}F(x) = 0$ and $\lim_{x\to\infty}F(x) = 1$.
expand proof

($\Rightarrow$) is trivial.
($\Leftarrow$) we proof this by construction. Let $\Omega = [0,1]$, $\mathcal{ F} = \mathcal{B}([0,1])$, $P=\lambda$ (Lebesgue measure). Let $X(\omega) = \sup\{y:~ F(y)<\omega\}$. Then $X$ is a random variable. To show $P(X\le x) = P(\{\omega:~ 0\le\omega\le F(x)\}),~ \forall x$, it is equivalent to show that $\{\omega:~ X(\omega) \le x\} = \{\omega: \omega \le F(x)\},~ \forall x$.
  First given $x$, $\omega_0 \in \{\omega:~ \omega \le F(x)\}$, we get $x \notin \{y:~ F(y) < \omega_0\}$. Thus $X(\omega_0) \le x$ and we get $\{\omega:~ X(\omega) \le x\} \supset \{\omega: \omega \le F(x)\}$. Next, suppose $\omega_0 \notin \{\omega: \omega \le F(x)\}$, then $\omega_0 > F(x)$. Since $F$ is right-continuous, there exists $\epsilon > 0$ such that $F(x) \le F(x+\epsilon) < \omega_0$. Hence $x<x+\epsilon\le X(\omega_0)$ and $\{\omega:~ X(\omega) \le x\} \subset \{\omega: \omega \le F(x)\}$. Finally we get $F(x) = \lambda(0, F(x)] = P(\{\omega:~ X(\omega) \le x\}) = P(X \le x)$.



Acknowledgement

This post is based on the textbook Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th edition (Durrett, 2019) and the lecture at Seoul National University, Republic of Korea (instructor: Prof. Johan Lim).




Author | Sihyung Park

I am Sihyung Park (pronounced “See-He-Young”), a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Statistics at North Carolina State University. My research focuses on causal inference, specifically addressing unmeasured confounding and principal stratification in observational studies, as well as high-dimensional methods. Grounded in my early background in ecology and genomics, I aim to bring methodological insights to problems in genomics and evolutionary biology.